Bewildering Blackout of Nepal News
16 04 2008Something extraordinary happened this past weekend on the roof of the world, but you would not know it from much of the North American press.
Voters in Nepal confounded all expectations and gave Maoist ex-guerrillas a majority in constituency assembly elections set up to draft a new constitution for a new Nepal. Traditional centre and centre-left parties were routed and left far behind in the seat count. Rightist royalist factions were completely annihilated.
This stunning electoral event guarantees the end of a civil war that claimed up to 13,000 lives over the past ten years and the end of a controversial monarchy that had always loomed larger than life in the impoverished country of 29 million. Nepal also becomes the first country with an elected Maoist government, a new reality that the BBC likened to a “Thunderbolt.”
Despite the dramatic results, reporting has been poor or absent at best in the West except in the UK whose old ties with Nepal include recruitment for its famed Royal Gurkha Regiment who themselves have protested discriminatory treatment in the past few weeks. Even jarring pictures of cheering youth, waving the hammer and sickle were not enough to rouse even the slightest notice. Indeed, US National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley’s gaffe confusing Nepal and Tibet on ABC received greater coverage in the US blogosphere than the revolution taking place under the shadow of Mount Everest.
In an interesting illustration of this blind spot, Jimmy Carter’s presence as a poll observer was widely covered in the Nepali press yet also garnered little notice in the West. In comparison, his subsequent effort to restart the Israel-Palestine peace process was widely covered and debated. While any press observer would have found this predictable, given that region’s near monopoly of the West’s foreign news coverage, it does reveal the extent to which the Western press is so poor at covering much if not most of the rest of the world.
Even more glaringly, progressive news outlets have largely remained silent, perhaps unable or unwilling to analyse the ascent of a far-left party that they know very little about beyond negative mainstream protrayals. Only Monthly Review, the standard bearer for non-partisan Marxist perspectives, has covered the events largely with the dispatches from their Norwegian man on the spot, Johan Andresen. Most every other magazine, web forum, blog, or news feed either failed to cover or simply reposted mainstream articles in the first four days after trends had become readily apparent. Today, University History professor Gary Leupp made this same point on Counterpunch.
This lack of coverage stands in sharp contrast to the situation in neighbouring Tibet, which because of its celebrated status in the West and the upcoming Olympics, has garnered enormous ongoing attention from all quarters. That Nepal’s politics are in some ways heading in the opposite direction should have at least shunted some of this reporting towards Nepal if only to compare and contrast the divergent political trajectories. Moreover, while geographically smaller, Nepal’s population is ten times that of the Tibetan Autonomous Region, with an even larger diaspora labouring throughout the world. The country does deserve some coverage, no?
Categories : electoral politics, himalayas, war and peace
Not to take anything away from Italy’s victory at the World Cup, but Zidane’s loss of temper on Sunday evening was truly a tragic end to an incredible career for this generation’s all around greatest soccer player. Zidane remains a hero though for France and especially its immigrant population, and he even won the MVP award for the entire tournament. The 




